The shape of Colorado's borders does not form a trapezoid, even on a two dimensional map. On some maps Colorado (and Wyoming) appear to be rectangles...but this is a misleading feature of Mercator projection maps which treat longitudes as parallel when in reality longitude lines converge (get closer) as you move towards the poles. Because of this Colorado's northern border is about 21 miles shorter than its southern border. This might lead one to think that the shape of Colorado is trapezoidal. However, when you use an Equal Area projection type map that shows the northern border to be shorter than the southern border something else happens. The northern and southern borders become curves...actually arcs or sections of circles with diameters of about 6000 miles. Therefore, since a trapezoid would require two parallel lines, the shape of Colorado would not qualify because the northern and southern borders are not lines at all, but portions of circles.
Colorado's shape is close to being a latitude-longitude quadrangle. I say "close" because an LLQ is a portion of a spherical surface and the earth is not exactly spherical...is is an ellipsoid which is wider at the equator compared to other latitudes than a true sphere. The other reason I say "close" is because the shape of Colorado, which was originally defined by Congress based solely on latitude and longitude, has now been defined by the monuments that surveyors put in the ground to define its borders. So...even lines that should have been exactly straight or followed the latitudinal curves of the earth are not because of human error. In some cases these errors are quite significant...up to a mile from where they "should" be.
A trapezoid is a polygon. Therefore, a trapezoid has no height
A trapezoid with congruent diagonals is an isosceles trapezoid.
The base angels of a trapezoid are the angles that attach to the legs of the trapezoid. There are four base angles in a trapezoid.
Yes it is. The reason you decide to call it a trapezoid is because it is a trapezoid,and if it were not one, you would not call it one. So, since it has the label "trapezoid"painted on it when you meet it, and we have just said that in order to earn thatlabel it must be a trapezoid, we may conclude that if it is known to be a trapezoid,then it must ipso facto be a trapezoid.
It has 2 classifications which are a trapezoid and an isosceles trapezoid
No, not every trapezoid is an isosceles trapezoid.
The altitude of a trapezoid bisects the bases of the trapezoid.
All the names to classify a trapezoid are a trapezoid and a quadrilateral.
A trapezoid can also take the form of an isosceles trapezoid
A trapezoid is a polygon. Therefore, a trapezoid has no height
A trapezoid with congruent diagonals is an isosceles trapezoid.
If the two sides which are not parallel have equal lengths, then the trapezoid is called an isosceles trapezoid (standard trapezoid has unequal sides). The base angles in an isosceles trapezoid are equal in measurement, also I know that a trapezoid with two nonparallel sides the same length is called an isosceles trapezoid.
The leg of a trapezoid is one of the two nonparallel sides of the trapezoid. However, the base of a trapezoid is of the two parallel sides of the trapezoid.
A trapezoid is a quadrilateral and has four faces.
Yes, the diagonals of a trapezoid are congruent.Another Answer:-The diagonals of a trapezoid are congruent only when it is in the form of an isosceles trapezoid.
Yes, the diagonals of a trapezoid are congruent.Another Answer:-The diagonals of a trapezoid are congruent only when it is in the form of an isosceles trapezoid.
The base angels of a trapezoid are the angles that attach to the legs of the trapezoid. There are four base angles in a trapezoid.