answersLogoWhite

0

Attention:

Only (N+).

Fermat's last Theorem z ^ 3 = x ^ 3 + y ^ 3 is capable exists a solution if fully meet the following conditions:

First step:

(1+2+3+4+........+a)^2+(1+2+3+4+........+b)^2=v^2.

In fact, using the computer, this equation has the ability to survive.

Second step:

(1+2+3+4+........+a+1)^2+(1+2+3+4+........+b+1)^2=s^2.

Third step:

v=1+2+3+4+........+c.

In fact, using the computer, third step and first step have the ability to survive in same time.

Fourth step:

s=1+2+3+4+........d.

Fifth step:

d=c+1

If all five steps are satisfied.This equation is capable of existence.

[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2=[x(x+1)/2]^2- [x(x-1)/2]^2+[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [y(y-1)/2]^2.

Because:

z^3=[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2.

Mean this equation is capable of existence.

z^3=x^3+y^3.

However, too hard to satisfy all five conditions in same time..

And an other solution:

Attention about series of number:

1,3,6,10,15,21,28,36,45........

Recognize:

10 and 15 are two number consecutive which belong this string.

Having:

15^2 - 10^2=5^3.

Or:

z^3=[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2.

Impossible in same time exist both:

[z(z+1)/2]^2=[x(x+1)/2]^2+[y(y+1)/2]^2

And

[z(z-1)/2]^2=[x(x-1)/2]^2+[y(y-1)/2]^2

Attention:

All numbers as z(z+1)/2 and x(x+1)/2 and y(y+1)/2 and z(z-1)/2 and x(x-1)/2 and y(y-1)/2 are belong this string and they are Pythagorean

This is main proof:

z^3=[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2

Define:

x<x+a<y.

x^3+y^3=[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [x(x-1)/2]^2 - [(x+1)^3+(x+2)^3+........+(x+a-1)^3+(x+a)^3+(x+a+1)^3+........+(y-1)^3]

Suppose:

z^3=x^3+y^3.

Because also:

(x+a)^3= [(x+a)(x+a+1)/2]^2 - [(x+a)(x+a-1)/2]^2.

Therefore a system of equations is generated.

[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2=[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [x(x-1)/2]^2 - [(x+a)(x+a+1)/2]^2 + [(x+a)(x+a-1)/2]^2 - [(x+1)^3+(x+2)^3+........+(x+a-1)^3+(x+a+1)^3+........+(y-1)^3]

[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2=[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [x(x-1)/2]^2 - [(x+b)(x+b+1)/2]^2 + [(x+b)(x+b-1)/2]^2 - [(x+1)^3+(x+2)^3+........+(x+b-1)^3+(x+b+1)^3+........+(y-1)^3]

[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2=[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [x(x-1)/2]^2 - [(x+c)(x+c+1)/2]^2 + [(x+c)(x+c-1)/2]^2 - [(x+1)^3+(x+2)^3+........+(x+c-1)^3+(x+c+1)^3+........+(y-1)^3]

[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2=[y(y+1)/2]^2 - [x(x-1)/2]^2 - [(x+d)(x+d+1)/2]^2 + [(x+d)(x+d-1)/2]^2 - [(x+1)^3+(x+2)^3+........+(x+d-1)^3+(x+d+1)^3+........+(y-1)^3].

........

Can not count the number of equations because number (a) can change to infinity.

And finally a great equation metamorphosis:

Using the two formulas by rotation affect each other:

z^3=[z(z+1)/2]^2 - [z(z-1)/2]^2

And

[z(z+1)/2]^2=1^3+2^3+........+z^3.

This method makes the original equation z ^ 3 = x ^ 3 + y ^ 3 is structured like a Robot Bumblebee Transformer.

Similar,this method is used for general case:

z ^ n = x ^ n + y ^ n.

Mean:

z ^ (n-3) ​​* z ^ 3 = x ^ (n-3) ​​* x ^ 3 + y ^ (n-3) ​​* y^ 3. 

You can structure this equation according to your own discretion.

ADIEU.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is Fermat's last Theorem a equation metamorphosis?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What is the number that no value of can be greater than for the solutions to the equation in fermats last theorem?

Fermat's last theorem states that the equation xn + yn = zn has no integer solutions for x, y and z when the integer n is greater than 2. When n=2, we obtain the Pythagoras theorem.


Did anyone oppose to the pythgreom theorm?

Although the Pythagorean theorem (sums of square of a right angled triangle) is called a theorem it has many mathematical proofs (including the recent proof of Fermats last theorem which tangentially also prooves Pythagorean theorem). In fact Pythagorean theorem is an 'axiom', a kind of 'super law'. It doesn't matter if anyone does oppose it, it is one of the few fundamental truths of the universe.


Is anything named after Pierre de Fermat?

Yes, the famous Fermat's Last Theorem, a conjecture by Fermat, that an equation of the form an + bn = cn has no integer solution, for n > 2. This was conjectured by Fermat in 1637, but it was only proved in 1995.Yes, the famous Fermat's Last Theorem, a conjecture by Fermat, that an equation of the form an + bn = cn has no integer solution, for n > 2. This was conjectured by Fermat in 1637, but it was only proved in 1995.Yes, the famous Fermat's Last Theorem, a conjecture by Fermat, that an equation of the form an + bn = cn has no integer solution, for n > 2. This was conjectured by Fermat in 1637, but it was only proved in 1995.Yes, the famous Fermat's Last Theorem, a conjecture by Fermat, that an equation of the form an + bn = cn has no integer solution, for n > 2. This was conjectured by Fermat in 1637, but it was only proved in 1995.


What is a Theorem ender?

QED, Fermat's Last Theorem.


Why wasn't Fermats last theorem written on paper?

But it was. That is why we know about it. If you mean why the PROOF was not written- Fermat wrote that he had found a wonderful proof for the theorem, but unfortunately the margin was too small to contain it. This is why the theorem became so famous- being understandable by even a schoolchild, but at the same time so hard to prove that even the best mathematicians had to surrender, with a simple proof seemingly being existent that just nobody except Fermat could find. The theorem has since been proven but the proof uses math tools that are very advanced and were not available in Fermat's life-time.