Seeing as Indiana is only one state out of the 50 which make up the US (which also includes several unincorporated territories, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico), it's only natural that it would be less.
Can you be more specific? There will be MANY cities with a population of less than 100,000.
As of 2005, .88 percent of the world population lived on less than 1 dollar a day. More than 660 million people without any sanitation live on less than $2 a day, and more than 385 million people on less than $1 a day. There are about 1 billion people who live in poverty.
a is 6 less than d.
2 is more than 1.
2 is less than 5.
The UK has a larger population than South Africa.
Can you be more specific? There will be MANY cities with a population of less than 100,000.
maybe less than 1,000,000,000,000 or more than1,000,000,000,000
You can see more and better conditions of food, less population and less pollution.
The current population of Brazil is 196.7 million. This is more than the population of Mexico, but less than the population of the United States of America.1
According to the US census, less. It is 885,122 people.
More - see the link below.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
In 1929, it is estimated that less than 10% of Americans earned more than $5,000. This was a time of economic inequality with the majority of the population earning less than that amount.
less than
An aging population often has a fixed or limited income. They are willing to spend less on clothing than younger generations. They are less fashion conscious than younger clients and are more likely to replace clothing less frequently than younger customers.
Less than 0.1% of the population, there are no more then 4200 vegans in New Zealand.