no
Yes, if it is a whole number but not if it is a fraction
No, not always since: if a number is more than 1, then its square root is smaller than the number. if a number is less than 1, then its square root is bigger than the number.
no
No.
no
Yes, if it is a whole number but not if it is a fraction
Yes, unless the original number is 0 or 1.
Yes, there is. Just as there is no largest number, there is no largest square number. For example, if you calculate the square of 975, you get a number that is (a) larger than 975, and (b) by definition, a square number.
No, not always since: if a number is more than 1, then its square root is smaller than the number. if a number is less than 1, then its square root is bigger than the number.
A square meter is a million times larger than a square millimeter.
no
No.
New York is larger than Ohio by number of square miles.
Usually the square of a number is greater than the original number (2x2=4, -2x-2=4) wherther the number is negative or positive. The square of 1 is the same (1x1=1) but the square of -1 is greater (-1x-1=1) The square of positive decimal numbers is smaller than the original number (0.1x0.1=0.01) and the square of negative decimal numbers is larger than the original number (-0.1x-0.1=0.01)
Not always, if the smaller number is 0 or a negative number. Then their sum will be equal or less than the greater number.
Since the square root of a number is the "number times itself that equals the original number," it makes sense that the larger the original number, then the larger the square root. The value of the square root of 2 will be greater than the value of the square root of 1.5.