0
A car can be faster in any gear depending on its design and engine power. Generally, the higher the gear, the faster the car can go given enough power and torque. However, it's important to note that speed is also influenced by factors such as road conditions, driver skill, and traffic.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is 1 over 3 minus 2 over 3?
negative 1 over 3
What is 1 minus 3?
4
What is -1+-2?
-1 + -2 is the same as -1 - 2. -1 - 2 = -3
What is 1 of 2 - 1 of 3 equals?
There is some ambiguity in the use of "of". If 1 of 2 = 2, and 1 of 3 = 3 then 1 of 2 - 1 of 3 = -1 Alternatively, 1/2 - 1/3 = 3/6 - 2/6 = 1/6
What is 1 and 1 over 3 times 2 over 3?
1 1/3 × 2/3 = (1×3+1)/3 × 2/3 = 4/3 × 2/3 = (4×2)/(3×3) = 8/9
There are 3 people number 1 is faster than number 2 number 2 is faster than number 3 number 3 is faster than number 1 who's the fastest?
It is impossible to answer because 1 runs faster than 2, 2 runs faster than 3, but 3 runs faster than 1. This is an example of a circular argument to which there is no solution. Unless of course it is a riddle.
Who is at fault for car 1 when car 2 slammed his brakes on and car 3 hit car 2 and car 2 hit car 1?
Car 3 would be at fault for all damages. From the description it sounds like car 2 had to make a stop and car 3 had either enough speed or weight to force car 2 into car 1. Car 3 should have allowed enough space in front of it to avoid any crashes. Now, if car 2 had hit car 1 and then a moment later car 3 hit car 2, car 2 would be at fault for car 1 and car 3 would be at fault for car 2. In an event like this, make sure a POLICE REPORT is made.
Who is at fault when car 2 hits car 1 and causes car 3 to slam on brakes and hits car 2?
it is car 2's fault because it hit car 1 forcing car 3 to hit car 2
Who is at fault in a 3 car accident if car 1 is at a complete stop at a stop sign car 2 is cut off by car 3 and car 2 slams into car 1 Car 3 has no damage whatsoever?
Since car 3 was the initial cause of the accident, car 3 is at fault. If car 3 had not cut off car 2, car 2 would not have hit car 1, and if that was the case there would not have been an accident. As I said, car 3 is at fault. Hope this helps.
Who is at fault if car 1 cuts off car 2 making him rear end car 1 thus making car 3 rear end car 2?
Car 1 for causing car 2 to hit car 1.Car 3 for hitting car 2 (was obviously too close to car 2) as they we're not observing safe stopping distances between cars.
If car 1 hits car 2 car 2 loses control of wheel hits car 3 who is parked car 1 is a hit and run does car 2 have to pay car 3?
Yes, car 2 would need to assume the costs of car 3. Car 3 would not have to assume the costs since car was not in motion.Added: It is questionable whether Car 2 could be held liable or not. In this particular case, the insurors of both Car 2 and Car 3 would probably go to subrogation to settle the damages.
Which is faster bugatti or ssc?
Depends on the model of the car, the fastest is. 1) Bugatti Veyron Super Sport. 2) SSC Ultimate Aero TT. 3) Bugatti Veyron.
What is the firing order for a 2005 Subaru Impreza?
1-3-2-4 cylinder layout 3 4 1 2 Front of car coil pack layout [3--4] [1--2] Front of car
Firing order for a 2005 Subaru Impreza?
1-3-2-4 cylinder layout 3 4 1 2 Front of car coil pack layout [3--4] [1--2] Front of car
Who is at fault when there is a 3 car collision and car 3 hits the car 2 without applying the brakes and car 2 hits car 1?
If all the cars are going in the same direction, then car 3 is at fault for either following too closely or negiligent operation. As long as the cause of car 2 hitting car 1 was ONLY the imact of car 3, that is, if he wasn't following too closely too, car 2 has no fault and no liability.
Who is at fault when car 1 hits car 2 who hits a parked car 3?
Car 1 would be at fault as it was the initiator of the acident.
Who is at fault when car 1 stops causing car 2 to hit car 1 and car 3 hits car 2?
it depends why car 1 stopped. if it was red light and car 1 stopped then it was car 2s fault. if car 1 stopped for no reason, and car 2 hit it, it would be both of their faults.Another View: The first contributor is correct in stating that the driver of Car #1 MIGHT have contributed to the accident however, the drivers of Car #2 and Car #3 would be charged with either Following Too Closely, or Failing to Give Full Time and Attention to their driving.
