No, a trapezoid is not a parallelogram. And a trapiozed is nothing.
"Trapiozed" does not appear to be a standard term or concept in English. It may be a misspelling or a specialized term within a particular field. If you meant "trapezoid," it refers to a four-sided figure (quadrilateral) with at least one pair of parallel sides. Please provide more context or clarify the term for a more accurate response.
No, a parallelogram is not a trapezoid.
Square = parallelogram and a square trapezoid = trapezoid Parallelogram = Parallelogram
No, a parallelogram is not always a square, but a square is a parallelogram.
No, a parallelogram is not necessarily square.However, by definition, a square is always a parallelogram.
A= 1/2 (b1+b2) h
"Trapiozed" does not appear to be a standard term or concept in English. It may be a misspelling or a specialized term within a particular field. If you meant "trapezoid," it refers to a four-sided figure (quadrilateral) with at least one pair of parallel sides. Please provide more context or clarify the term for a more accurate response.
yes a parallelogram is a parallelogram
No, a parallelogram is not a trapezoid.
it is a ............................................................................................. parallelogram
No, a parallelogram is not always a square, but a square is a parallelogram.
The root word in "parallelogram" is "parallelogram".
Square = parallelogram and a square trapezoid = trapezoid Parallelogram = Parallelogram
No, a parallelogram is not always a square, but a square is a parallelogram.
No, a parallelogram is not necessarily square.However, by definition, a square is always a parallelogram.
because both lines are paralle so it is a parallelogram
If it is a parallelogram, then it has two sets of parallelogram sides. Parallelograms' opposite angles are congruent A parallelogram's bisectors are congruent. * * * * * A parallelogram's bisectors are NOT congruent.