The term "disany land" and "disany world" isn't widely recognized or defined in common discourse. If "disany" is a fictional or specific context, then the size comparison would depend on the parameters set within that context. Generally, a "world" typically encompasses more area than a "land." If you provide more details about what "disany" refers to, I can give a more accurate answer.
Well, sweetheart, in the world of numbers, 2.8 is actually bigger than 2.5. It's like asking if a cupcake is bigger than a mini cupcake - the bigger number wins every time. So, in this case, 2.8 takes the cake.
No, Wales is not bigger than Denmark. Wales has an area of about 20,779 square kilometers, while Denmark covers approximately 43,094 square kilometers. Therefore, Denmark is significantly larger than Wales in terms of land area.
0.85 is smaller than 1. 3.4 is bigger than 1. "Bigger than 1" is bigger than "smaller than 1".
52ounces is bigger than
Billion is bigger than million
No. Elephants are the biggest land animals in the world.
No, the United States is bigger in land area than Canada. The US is the third-largest country in the world by land area, while Canada is the second-largest.
yes
India is biger than green land
yes usa is bigger than by both by population and by land area
In land mass, France is much bigger than Ireland.
No Japan is bigger than New Zealand.
yes usa is bigger than mexico by both by population and by land area
yes usa is bigger than sweden by both by population and by land area
yes usa is bigger than norway by both by population and by land area
yes usa is bigger than denmark by both by population and by land area
yes usa is bigger than finland by both by population and by land area