Tradionally 8 is represented as VIII in Roman numerals but in parts of Spain 8 is given as IIX so therefore both formats are acceptable.
Yes. Eight can be written as VIII or IIX when writing in Roman numerals, though the former is more commonly used. According to Wikipedia IIX was used more commonly during the middle ages, though still rarer than VIII.
IIX means 8.For the Time, 8.
Neither is correct. The nearest correct statement that can be constructed from anything close to the given materials is: "Eight and eight are sixteen."
LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.
Tradionally 8 is represented as VIII in Roman numerals but in parts of Spain 8 is given as IIX so therefore both formats are acceptable.
Yes. Eight can be written as VIII or IIX when writing in Roman numerals, though the former is more commonly used. According to Wikipedia IIX was used more commonly during the middle ages, though still rarer than VIII.
IIX means 8.For the Time, 8.
Neither is correct. The nearest correct statement that can be constructed from anything close to the given materials is: "Eight and eight are sixteen."
LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.
The Roman numeral for 8 is VIII V being 5, and III being 3. Each I standing in the place of a 1. There is an often made mistake that 8 is IIX. This is incorrect.
8 8 1981 in Roman numerals is VIII VIII MDCCCCLXXXI or IIX IIX XXMMI. Note that 1981 is not MCMLXXXI in Roman numerals.
IIX - II - MMVII
neither is correct, because eight and five equals thirteen!
In ancient Rome the equivalent of 8 was IIX thus using less numerals or VIII in the same way that 9 was IX or VIIII. But in the Middle Ages the rules governing the Roman numeral system were changed to how we still use them today as for example we would convert 1999 into Roman numerals as MCMXCIX but the Romans probably wrote it out simply as IMM (2000-1)
eight is enough
In ancient Rome and medieval times 8 was commonly written as IIX thus using less than VIII in the same way that 9 is now IX instead of VIIII