answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes it is correct because it will equal to x=10 minus ii =2 equals to 8

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is iix also correct as eight?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why it is not correct to write IIX?

Tradionally 8 is represented as VIII in Roman numerals but in parts of Spain 8 is given as IIX so therefore both formats are acceptable.


Can 8 be typed IIX in roman numerals?

Yes. Eight can be written as VIII or IIX when writing in Roman numerals, though the former is more commonly used. According to Wikipedia IIX was used more commonly during the middle ages, though still rarer than VIII.


What does iix mean in roman numerals?

IIX means 8.For the Time, 8.


Which is correct Eight and eight are fifteen or eight and eight is fifteen?

Neither is correct. The nearest correct statement that can be constructed from anything close to the given materials is: "Eight and eight are sixteen."


What is the roman numeral llx?

LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.


Roman numeral for eight?

The Roman numeral for 8 is VIII V being 5, and III being 3. Each I standing in the place of a 1. There is an often made mistake that 8 is IIX. This is incorrect.


LWhat is 8 8 1981 in roman numerals?

8 8 1981 in Roman numerals is VIII VIII MDCCCCLXXXI or IIX IIX XXMMI. Note that 1981 is not MCMLXXXI in Roman numerals.


What are the roman numerals for 8-2-2007?

IIX - II - MMVII


Is it correct to say eight and five is fourteen or eight and five are fourteen?

neither is correct, because eight and five equals thirteen!


Why is eight not written as iix in roman numerals?

In ancient Rome the equivalent of 8 was IIX thus using less numerals or VIII in the same way that 9 was IX or VIIII. But in the Middle Ages the rules governing the Roman numeral system were changed to how we still use them today as for example we would convert 1999 into Roman numerals as MCMXCIX but the Romans probably wrote it out simply as IMM (2000-1)


Which is the correct grammar Eight is enough or Eight are enough?

eight is enough


Why can't 8 be written as iix?

In ancient Rome and medieval times 8 was commonly written as IIX thus using less than VIII in the same way that 9 is now IX instead of VIIII