Any generalisation of that kind is total nonsense.
Possibly. You also have to be good at and enjoy engineering concepts which do involve math.
Not necessarily. Math is the language of science, rather than writing. Being a good writer may help, but being strong in the math section is more important. If you understand the math portion, there is no way you can fail
Math will help, not hinder, you in this. You actually need a LOT of math, especially for physics and engineering.
Neither is correct. It should be "for me who enjoy math." Some will say "for me who enjoys math."
I didn't, so the hypothesis is false.
Mathematics is an important part of all the other sciences such as chemistry and thermodynamics; mathematics has rightly been called the language of science. So no, being good at math does not mean that you will fail chemistry, quite the opposite.
No. Success at math is more likely to improve your skills at thermodynamics. All sciences benefit from some degree of math skill even if only for the ability to think in logical terms.
The opposite is true. You will more than likely be good at science.
No, this is a generalization and a stereotype. Most sciences require mathematics to function, and statements like this are fallacies and myths.
If your also good at physics/science, then no.
Possibly. You also have to be good at and enjoy engineering concepts which do involve math.
Thermodynamics is a part of physics, and physics is very closely related to maths. Physics involves a lot of mathematical equations and problems, and as such, to be good in thermodynamics, you have to be good in maths.
You'll certainly not fail physics BECAUSE you are good at math - you NEED math for physics and engineering.
You need good math to do engineering at a professional level.
No, this is not obligatory.
No.
no