No.
It can be written as:
64 = 26 = 43 = 82 = 641
= 1286/7 = 2563/4 = 5122/3 = 10243/5 = 20486/11 = 40961/2 = ...
= 64ei2π = 64ei4π = 64ei6π = 64ei2kπ (∀ k ∈ ℤ)
True
false
That the single integer before the decimal point is not less than 1 and is not greater than 9
No. For it to be written in true scientific notation, the matissa must be greater than of equal to 1 (it is) and less than 10 (it isn't). The correct form would be 4.56*104
The base of 1 is not used for exponential functions because it does not produce varied growth rates. An exponential function with a base of 1 would result in a constant value (1), regardless of the exponent, failing to demonstrate the characteristic rapid growth or decay associated with true exponential behavior. Therefore, bases greater than 1 (for growth) or between 0 and 1 (for decay) are required to reflect the dynamic nature of exponential functions.
true
True
true
It is a true statement.
positive
False because 0.8 is a rational number which can be expressed as a fraction of 4/5 in its simplest form
True
true
That would be an exponential decay curve or negative growth curve.
That is correct.
written communication
False. an irrational number can not be written as a fraction. In fact, that is the definition of an irrational number.