There really isn't a uniform, generally accepted, definition for "whole numbers", or even for "natural numbers".
Traditionally, "natural numbers" means {1, 2, 3, ...}. However, more recently, it was seen convenient to include zero, so "natural numbers" would mean the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
In the case of "whole numbers", the situation is even worse; some define it to include not only zero, but also negative numbers. Others don't include negative numbers.
Suggestion: When you need to avoid confusion, use non-ambiguous names such as:
* "Integers" for {... -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}
* "Positive integers" for {1, 2, 3, ...}
* "Non-negative integers" for {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}
The is false. "the whole number" is a single number while "the set of natural numbers" is a set. A single number cannot be equal to a set.
Yes, it is true.
No, integers are positive and negative whole numbers
True.
Yes all counting numbers are whole numbers, but the reverse is not true (zero!)
true
true
It depends, many people do count 0 as a natural number, but MOST do not. So for most HS text book, the answer is NO, all whole numbers are not natural numbers and the reason is 0 is a whole number but not a natural number.
False
the set of whole numbers include zero but the natural numbers do not? true or false
True. Zero is in the set of whole numbers, integers, rational numbers and real numbers but not natural numbers. Natural numbers are often referred to as the "counting numbers" or how you learned to count. When we are teaching little children numbers, we never start with zero or negative numbers - just 1, 2, 3...
true
Yes. You know this is true because you learned a process-- an "algorithm"--for adding two numbers together, and if you start with two whole numbers, the result is also a whole number.
The is false. "the whole number" is a single number while "the set of natural numbers" is a set. A single number cannot be equal to a set.
There is some disagreement. Some people include zero in the set of natural numbers (like whole numbers), some people don't (like counting numbers).
That depends - unfortunately, "whole number" is ambiguous, and can mean different things to different people. If by "whole number" you mean "natural number", then both are of course the same. If you choose to include negative numbers in your definition of "whole number", i.e., whole numbers = integers, then the two sets are not the same, and the proposed statement is false.
Yes, no irrational numbers are whole numbers.