Absolutely not. Mass and weight are two entirely different things. Every object has a mass which is a measure of the amount of matter that it contains. It is a property of the object and is essentially a constant. I say essentially because radioactive decay (and fusion is stars) can alter the mass of an object by converting some mass into energy or the other way around.
Weight, on the other hand, is a measure of how that mass is affected by gravitational attraction. On the surface of the earth, a mass of one kilogram will have a weight of approximately 9.8 Newtons, but on the moon, the same kilogram will have a mass of only a sixth as much because the moon's gravity is so much weaker. On a neutron star, on the other hand, the same kilogram mass, would weight about 200 billion times as much as on earth. In outer space, it could be weightless.
To get the accurate weight/mass before the objects gets wet.
weight and mass measures the volume
Mass and weight are two different things. It does not make sense to ask which is more accurate. Mass is used to measure an object's ability to resist a force. f = ma, or m = f/a. Weight is used to measure an object's force applied due to gravity. Measured in newtons, f = ma, or newtons = kilograms time 9.81 meters per second squared.
To measure weight, a scale. To measure mass, a balance.
Weight is a measure of the gravitational pull for a mass , such that a mass of 1 Kg is having a weight of 10 Newton . So weight is a downward force measured in Newtons . Weight ( in N ) = Mass ( in Kg ) × Gravity ( usually 10N/Kg )
Mass is not the same as weight. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, while weight is the force of gravity acting on that object. Weight changes depending on the gravitational pull, while mass remains constant. Thus, mass is a more accurate measure of the quantity of matter in an object.
To get the accurate weight/mass before the objects gets wet.
Scientists might measure the mass of an object rather than its weight because mass is an intrinsic property of an object that does not change with location, while weight depends on the gravitational pull at a particular location. Mass provides a consistent and accurate measure of the amount of matter in an object, which is useful for making comparisons and calculations in science.
weight and mass measures the volume
Technically... not really. It would perhaps be more accurate to use the terms formula mass and molecular mass rather than formula weight and molecular weight. This because in physical terms, weight is a force while mass is a measure of the amount of substance in something.
Mass and weight are two different things. It does not make sense to ask which is more accurate. Mass is used to measure an object's ability to resist a force. f = ma, or m = f/a. Weight is used to measure an object's force applied due to gravity. Measured in newtons, f = ma, or newtons = kilograms time 9.81 meters per second squared.
To measure egg mass, use a scale that is accurate to the nearest gram. Place the egg on the scale and record the weight in grams. The egg mass is the weight of the egg alone, without any additional packaging or materials.
No, it is a measure of weight, there is a difference (Mass is mass, weight is the force exerted by your mass being pulled down by gravity)
Weight is the term for the mass times the acceleration. To measure that, you multiply the mass times the acceleration
Weight is the term for the mass times the acceleration. To measure that, you multiply the mass times the acceleration
-- An easy way is to put a known mass on a bathroom scale, weigh it, and divide its weight by its mass. -- A more complicated but more accurate way, for which you don't even need a known mass, is to build a pendulum, measure its length, then measure its period.
Weight is a measure of the action of gravity on a mass.