Three is not a multiple of six. Six is a multiple of three. And three is a factor of six.
If you mean what is the multiple OF three, the answer is 9
420
If the sum of the digits is a multiple of three, the whole number is a multiple of three.
9 isn't prime, but one three-digit multiple of 18 is 108.
If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.
400 is one such multiple.
No, 3 isn't a multiple of 6 because the first multiple of 6 is 6. 3 is a factor of 6. 6 is a multiple of 3.
Three is not a multiple of six. Six is a multiple of three. And three is a factor of six.
Assuming you mean "divisible", yes it is. One dozen is twelve, so two dozen is twenty-four, which is a multiple of three. An easy way to test if a number is a multiple of three is by adding up the digits; if it gives you another multiple of three, you're dealing with a multiple of three (2 + 4 = 6, 6 is a multiple of three, so 24 is too)
The LCM is: 6
If you mean what is the multiple OF three, the answer is 9
It is 0.7
To be a multiple of 6 a number must be even and a multiple of 3.356 is not a multiple of three. The short cut to that is if the digits add up to a multiple of three then the original number is a multiple of 3.
No, 28 could not be a multiple of 3.No. 28 divided by three is not a whole number, so it is not a multiple of three.
Yes, it is possible for one object to have three shadows if there are multiple light sources casting shadows from different angles. Each light source will create its own shadow, resulting in multiple shadows for the object.
The largest five-digit multiple of three is 99,999