Yes
Yes.
The equation of the line will also depend on its slope which has not been given and so an answer is not possible.
-10
No, it is not possible for the correlation and the slope to have opposite signs in a linear regression context. The correlation coefficient indicates the direction and strength of a linear relationship between two variables, while the slope represents the change in the dependent variable for a unit change in the independent variable. If the correlation is positive, the slope will also be positive; if the correlation is negative, the slope will likewise be negative.
6.530 and 6.5299... recurring are two possible answers.
Yes.
Steepest line possible dealing with slope is up to, but not including infinity.
Yes, the slope can be a fraction; and can be less than one or negative.
Try to do as little as possible of a slope, so you won't feel it but so it has a slope
No, if the minerals are deep, slope mining is not possible.
The equation of the line will also depend on its slope which has not been given and so an answer is not possible.
It really not possible. Other wise it will be in decimals.
1.48000, and 1.47999... are two possible answers.
-10
The slopes will be the same. It is also possible that both parallel lines have no slope defined - if they are vertical.
No, it is not possible for the correlation and the slope to have opposite signs in a linear regression context. The correlation coefficient indicates the direction and strength of a linear relationship between two variables, while the slope represents the change in the dependent variable for a unit change in the independent variable. If the correlation is positive, the slope will also be positive; if the correlation is negative, the slope will likewise be negative.
The given points of (-810) and (-8-7) are not possible to work out the slope for a straight line equation.