The definition of equivalent is something that is ... having the same valence; Geom. equal in area, volume, etc., but not of the same shape.
The length of both the Suburban and Yukon XL is 222.4 inches.
There can be no such cube since, by definition, all edges of a cube have the same length.
There can be no such cube since, by definition, all edges of a cube have the same length.
No. They are not the same. Look at (sq in) as an answer and (in sq) as a definition. For instance, sq in is the area of some object, an answer to the question "What is the area of a square 4.5 in on one side and 2 in on the other ?". However, in sq is the definition of a square. For example, I have a box 9 inches square. That is to say I have a box that is 9 inches wide and 9 inches long...... So, to illustrate that sq in is not the same as in sq, consider that a box 9 in sq would have an area of 81 sq in. And that is a whole lot different from 9 sq in. Hope this helps and has not confused you.
Rural area.
If it is the same as on 2000 suburban its located in the cargo area on the drivers side, there is a rectangle plastic bowl near the window, pull that out and the jack is mounted inside.
There is nothing spectacular about the terms. It is merely the areas from which law is meted out although the demographics are quite different. Even though the laws for a particular state are the same, where an individual live in that state may have a big impact on how law is meted out. Rural America has its way of dealing with particular violations, suburban America another and urban America their own.
Yes
a rural place is that have for example plantation is a thing that you do by your own and a urban place is that have more technology like a hospital a university is is a more develop place. Rural Urban Suburban are also general designations given by the US government agencies (often used for determining grants and tax incentives). Not all agencies use the exact same population break downs or terms (exam. some may use Metropolitan Areas). Furthermore, agencies who use Rural, Urban, and Suburban data, sometimes define the boundaries different than other agencies. Example: Urban: 3,000+ persons per square mile Suburban: 1,000 ‐ 3,000 persons per square mile Rural: less than 1,000 persons per square mile
number of same species within a certain area.
NO they are not.
Rural electrification is, by definition, the bringing of electricity to rural areas. Of course, not all rural areas are brought onto the grid at the same time, because such programs are staggered to avoid overloading the grid and causing blackouts. Other areas are just hard to electrify because of their physical characteristics, and require substantial work to install the equipment necessary to electrify them.
There are no universally agreed-upon boundaries. However, Rural Urban Suburban are general designations given by the US government agencies (often used for determining grants and tax incentives). Not all agencies use the exact same population break downs or terms (exam. some may use Metropolitan Areas). Furthermore, agencies who use Rural, Urban, and Suburban data, sometimes define the boundaries different than other agencies. This link gives a pretty good explanation as to why (don't miss the detail tab at top): http://greatdata.com/rural-urban-data. Here are general break downs by ZIP Code: Urban: 3,000+ persons per square mile Suburban: 1,000 ‐ 3,000 persons per square mile Rural: less than 1,000 persons per square mile
Yes it is.
Yes it will, there the same.
Yes they will, There the same thing.