Yes.
Associative property would look like the following: 5 + (3 + 2) = (5 + 3) + 2 = 10
No, the set of integers is not associative under subtraction. The associative property states that for any three elements (a), (b), and (c), the equation ((a - b) - c) should equal (a - (b - c)). However, this is not true for subtraction; for example, if (a = 5), (b = 3), and (c = 1), then ((5 - 3) - 1 = 1) while (5 - (3 - 1) = 3), which are not equal.
No, subtraction is not associative. The associative property states that the grouping of numbers does not affect the result of an operation. For example, in subtraction, (5 - 3) - 2 equals 0, while 5 - (3 - 2) equals 4, demonstrating that changing the grouping changes the result. Thus, subtraction fails to satisfy the associative property.
There is no evidence of the associative property in the sequence of number given in the question.
If there is an equals sign between the 3 and 5 of 35, then it is the associative property of multiplication.
Associative property would look like the following: 5 + (3 + 2) = (5 + 3) + 2 = 10
No, the set of integers is not associative under subtraction. The associative property states that for any three elements (a), (b), and (c), the equation ((a - b) - c) should equal (a - (b - c)). However, this is not true for subtraction; for example, if (a = 5), (b = 3), and (c = 1), then ((5 - 3) - 1 = 1) while (5 - (3 - 1) = 3), which are not equal.
No, subtraction is not associative. The associative property states that the grouping of numbers does not affect the result of an operation. For example, in subtraction, (5 - 3) - 2 equals 0, while 5 - (3 - 2) equals 4, demonstrating that changing the grouping changes the result. Thus, subtraction fails to satisfy the associative property.
There is no evidence of the associative property in the sequence of number given in the question.
If there is an equals sign between the 3 and 5 of 35, then it is the associative property of multiplication.
The associative property requires that the order of operation can be changed without affecting the final result. This is clearly not the case with subtraction since: (5 - 3) - 2 = 2 - 2 = 0 while 5 - (3 - 2) = 5 - 1 = 4 The two answers are different so subtraction is not associative.
This is an example of the commutative property of multiplication
The associative power applies to an operation- such as multiplication or addition - not to specific numbers.
No, the associative property does not work for subtraction. The associative property states that the way numbers are grouped in an operation does not change their result, which is true for addition and multiplication. For subtraction, changing the grouping affects the outcome; for example, (10 - 2) - 3 equals 5, while 10 - (2 - 3) equals 11, demonstrating that the result depends on how the numbers are grouped.
True. You may not be able to switch numbers like 4-2=2-4 but you would say 4-2=-2+4 * * * * * That is not the associative property! The associative property requires that the order of operation can be changed without affecting the final result. This is clearly not the case with subtraction since: (5 - 3) - 2 = 2 - 2 = 0 while 5 - (3 - 2) = 5 - 1 = 4
False.
associative property