answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No. The null hypothesis is not considered correct. It is an assumption, and hypothesis testing is a consistent meand of determining whether the data is sufficiently strong to say that it may be untrue. The data either supports the alternative hypothesis or it fails to reject it. See examples in links. Also note this quote from Wikipedia: "Statistical hypothesis testing is used to make a decision about whether the data contradicts the null hypothesis: this is called significance testing. A null hypothesis is never proven by such methods, as the absence of evidence against the null hypothesis does not establish it."

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the null hypothesis considered correct until proven otherwise?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do scientists decide whether or not to reject or accept a hypothesis?

if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect


If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still not a considered proven?

A better explanation might exist.


If experiments supports a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still considered proven?

A better explanation might exist.


If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still not considered proven?

A better explanation might exist.


If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still considered not proven?

A better explanation might exist.


Why is the hypothesis still not considered proven If experiments support a hypothesis?

A better explanation might exist.


A scientist on television states that a hypothesis cannot be proven Access why this statement is correct?

This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.


Why is the hypothesis still not consider proven?

A better explanation might exist Hypothesis still not considered proven because it is always open to question and to any demonstration of its failure.


What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?

the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.


Why is the hypothesis still not considered?

A better explanation might exist Hypothesis still not considered proven because it is always open to question and to any demonstration of its failure.


Is a hypothesis considered to be a fact?

A hypothesis is a proposition to be proven or disproven by experiment or, in the case of statistics, to be assessed for its likelihood based on the numbers available.


Which two of the following characteristic must a hypothesis possess in order to be considered to be scientific?

A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.