The quotient of two nonzero integers is the definition of a rational number. There are nonzero numbers other than integers (imaginary, rational non-integers) that the quotient of would not be a rational number. If the two nonzero numbers are rational themselves, then the quotient will be rational. (For example, 4 divided by 2 is 2: all of those numbers are rational).
It is an incomplete definition of a rational number.
Yes.
If a number can be expressed as the quotient of two numbers (a ÷ b) and b is not zero, then it is a rational number.
The definition of a rational number is the quotient of any two nonzero integers.
The quotient of two nonzero integers is the definition of a rational number. There are nonzero numbers other than integers (imaginary, rational non-integers) that the quotient of would not be a rational number. If the two nonzero numbers are rational themselves, then the quotient will be rational. (For example, 4 divided by 2 is 2: all of those numbers are rational).
It is an incomplete definition of a rational number.
A rational number
Yes.
If a number can be expressed as the quotient of two numbers (a ÷ b) and b is not zero, then it is a rational number.
The definition of a rational number is the quotient of any two nonzero integers.
a rational number
It is a rational number.
They are called a rational number.
None. A rational number is a number that can be written as the quotient of two integers where the divisor is not zero. An irrational number is a real number that cannot be written as the quotient of two integers where the divisor is not zero. Any given real number either can or cannot be written as the quotient of two integers. If it can, it is rational. If it cannot, it is irrational. You can't be both at the same time. The square root of -1 is not a real number and it cannot be written as the quotient of two integers, so it is neither rational nor irrational.
It is a rational number.
Rational