1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
Zero is neither positive nor negative.
45825
-54 is included in negative integer or rational nos.
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.
The smallest positive integer is 1. The largest negative integer is -1. 1 > -1
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
No. Integers are positive and negative whole numbers (…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …). As there are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity (the greatest negative integer being -1), there can be no smallest (negative) integer.
The smallest positive factor of any positive integer is the number 1. If negative factors are allowed, the smallest factor is the negative of the absolute value of any integer.
Zero.
YES
No. Numbers go on forever.
-3
No one knows.
-10001