It is an expression, not an equation and so cannot be proportional nor non-proportional.
Directly proportional relationship is F=ma, F is directly proportional to a. Inversely proportional relationship is v=r/t, v is inversely proportional to t.
Disproportional.If instead you're looking for the antonym of directly proportional, that would be inversely proportional.
Your question is incomplete... proportional to WHAT?
Force is directly proportional to mass provided the acceleration is constant.
Proportional is when it is proportional.
A is proportional to C4.
It is an expression, not an equation and so cannot be proportional nor non-proportional.
Directly proportional relationship is F=ma, F is directly proportional to a. Inversely proportional relationship is v=r/t, v is inversely proportional to t.
The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
Directly proportional. Greater speed - greater distance.
Disproportional.If instead you're looking for the antonym of directly proportional, that would be inversely proportional.
Your question is incomplete... proportional to WHAT?
Force is directly proportional to mass provided the acceleration is constant.
Current is proportional to the potential difference and inversely proportional to resistance. Ohm's law: Current equals voltage divided by resistance
In a proportional war the collateral damage expected from any attack is proportional to the military advantage anticipated. In that respect, many consider the Iraq war was not proportional.
The answer is proportional.