0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why does the sum of rational number and irrational numbers are always irrational?
Let your sum be a + b = c, where "a" is irrational, "b" is rational, and "c" may be either (that's what we want to find out). In this case, c - b = a. If we assume that c is rational, you would have: a rational number minus a rational number is an irrational number, which can't be true (both addition and subtraction are closed in the set of rational numbers). Therefore, we have a contradiction with the assumption that "c" (the sum in the original equation) is rational.
What makes a number rational?
A rational number is one that can be expressed as ratio(or fraction) of two integers: given integers a & b (with b ≠ 0), then the fraction a / b (or a ÷ b) will be a rational number. We need to specify that b not equal to zero, as division by zero is not defined (well not for most math applications).So irrational numbers such as pi, e, and square root of 2: cannot in any way be resolved into a fraction of two integers. All rational numbers can. Examples are:0 is rational, let a = 0, b = 1, or any other non-zero integer: 0/1 = 0Whole numbers are rational: 1/1 = 1; 2/1 = 2; 100/25 = 4, etc.Negative integers are also rational: (-4)/(2) = -2, or (20)/(-5) = -4All fractions (proper and improper) which have integers in the numerator, and non-zero integer in denominator, as well as mixed numbers are rational {positive and negative} will be rational numbers.
What operation is the set of positive rational numbers not closed?
subtraction. Let's take 1/2 and subtract 3/4 which is great than 1/2 so the answer is negative and hence not a positive rational.
Why is the sum of a rational numbers and an irrational number is irrational?
Let x be a rational number and y be an irrational number.Suppose their sum = z, is rational.That is x + y = zThen y = z - xThe set of rational number is closed under addition (and subtraction). Therefore, z - x is rational.Thus you have left hand side (irrational) = right hand side (rational) which is a contradiction.Therefore, by reducio ad absurdum, the supposition that z is rational is false, ie the sum of a rational and an irrational must be irrational.
Is square root 36 rational?
Hmm, let me see ... 6. Since I'm not still writing decimals, yes, it's rational.
Can you multiply two rational numbers and come up with an irrational number?
No Explanation Suppose you could. Let x be an irrational number. Then take two rational numbers a,b and let ab=x Since a and b are rational, so is their product. So if x=ab, we have written a rational number as a ratio, namely ab/1 which is a contradiction. SO we conclude we cannot. A simpler answer might be just to say that rational numbers are closed under multiplication so it is impossible to get an irrational as the product of rationals.
Why is the product of any two rational numbers a rational number?
Rational numbers are represented in the form of p/q , where p is an integer and q is not equal to 0.Every natural number, whole number and integer can be represented as rational number.For example take the case of integer -3, it can be represented in the form of p/q as -3/1 and q is not equal to zero, which means that rational numbers consist of counting numbers, whole numbers and integers.Now, what will be the result of product of any two rational numbers?Let us take the case of two rational numbers which are x/y & w/z, their product is equal toxw/yz, which is a rational number because multiplication of x and w results in an integer and also multiplication of y and z results in an integer which satisfies the property of rational numbers, which is in the form of p/q.So, product of any two rational numbers is a rational number.
Would the difference of a rational number and a rational number be rational?
The difference of two rational numbers is rational. Let the two rational numbers be a/b and c/d, where a, b, c, and d are integers. Any rational number can be represented this way. Their difference is a/b-c/d = ad/bd-cb/bd = (ad-cb)/bd. Products and differences of integers are always integers. This means that ad-cb is an integer, and so is bd. Thus, (ad-cb)/bd is a rational number (since it is the ratio of two integers). This is equivalent to the difference of the original two rational numbers.
Why does the sum of rational number and irrational numbers are always irrational?
Let your sum be a + b = c, where "a" is irrational, "b" is rational, and "c" may be either (that's what we want to find out). In this case, c - b = a. If we assume that c is rational, you would have: a rational number minus a rational number is an irrational number, which can't be true (both addition and subtraction are closed in the set of rational numbers). Therefore, we have a contradiction with the assumption that "c" (the sum in the original equation) is rational.
Why is the product of a non - zero rational number and an irrational number is irrational?
Let q be a non-zero rational and x be an irrational number.Suppose q*x = p where p is rational. Then x = p/q. Then, since the set of rational numbers is closed under division (by non-zero numbers), p/q is rational. But that means that x is rational, which contradicts x being irrational. Therefore the supposition that q*x is rational must be false ie the product of a non-zero rational and an irrational cannot be rational.
What are rational numbers that are also integers?
All integers {..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...} are rational numbers because they can be expressed as p/q where p and q are integers. Let p equal whatever the integer is and q equal 1. Then p/q = p/1 = p where p is any integer. Thus, all integers are rational numbers.
Is 6.34 a rational number?
Yes
What makes a number rational?
A rational number is one that can be expressed as ratio(or fraction) of two integers: given integers a & b (with b ≠ 0), then the fraction a / b (or a ÷ b) will be a rational number. We need to specify that b not equal to zero, as division by zero is not defined (well not for most math applications).So irrational numbers such as pi, e, and square root of 2: cannot in any way be resolved into a fraction of two integers. All rational numbers can. Examples are:0 is rational, let a = 0, b = 1, or any other non-zero integer: 0/1 = 0Whole numbers are rational: 1/1 = 1; 2/1 = 2; 100/25 = 4, etc.Negative integers are also rational: (-4)/(2) = -2, or (20)/(-5) = -4All fractions (proper and improper) which have integers in the numerator, and non-zero integer in denominator, as well as mixed numbers are rational {positive and negative} will be rational numbers.
What operation is the set of positive rational numbers not closed?
subtraction. Let's take 1/2 and subtract 3/4 which is great than 1/2 so the answer is negative and hence not a positive rational.
What are three rational numbers between 15 and 16?
Oh, what a lovely question! Let's paint a happy little picture with numbers. Three rational numbers between 15 and 16 could be 15.1, 15.5, and 15.9. Just like adding different colors to a painting, numbers can be placed in between other numbers to create a beautiful sequence. Happy calculating!
Is 2.51 rational?
Any number that you can completely write down using digits is rational.Let's try to write 2.51 completely with digits:2.51That's it! We're pretty sure that 2.51 is rational. The official math definition of a rational number is: A number that can be writtenas a fraction made of whole numbers. Let's try and write 2.51 as a fractionmade of whole numbers:251/100We did it again! 2.51 is definitely rational.
How would you put rational in a sentence?
Rational means to be reasonable or to have reason. Let us be reasonable/rational. He was rational in his desition.
