That is the definition of a rational number.
Not necessarily. Remember that the definition of an irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a simple fraction. 2/3, for example, is rational by that definition even though its decimal form is a repeating decimal. Since irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions, they don't have fraction forms. So basically, numbers with repeating decimals are considered rational. Irrational numbers don't have repeating decimals.
If you mean a recurring or repeating decimal it's for example 2/3 = 0.666666 .... recuring 6
It is a non-terminating, non-repeating decimal representation. That is a definition of irrational numbers.
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
That's an irrational number.
That is the definition of a rational number.
A decimal with a continuously repeating digits or group of digits
Not necessarily. Remember that the definition of an irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a simple fraction. 2/3, for example, is rational by that definition even though its decimal form is a repeating decimal. Since irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions, they don't have fraction forms. So basically, numbers with repeating decimals are considered rational. Irrational numbers don't have repeating decimals.
If you mean a recurring or repeating decimal it's for example 2/3 = 0.666666 .... recuring 6
It is a non-terminating, non-repeating decimal representation. That is a definition of irrational numbers.
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
0.370 repeating is a decimal.
0.45 repeating is a decimal!
1.21 repeating ... is a decimal.
3.25 repeating ... is a decimal.
0.7777 repeating is a decimal.