Wiki User
∙ 10y ago-- In the number '61', the figure '6' means sixty.
-- In the number '678', the figure '6' means six hundred.
-- In the number '6,543', the figure '6' means six thousand.
-- In the number '6,164,629', the figure '6' appears three times
and each of them represents a different amount.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoNo, the sum could be a whole number. 1 and 2/3 + 3 and 1/3 = 5
It could be the Roman numeral C that stands for 100
Any numeral from 0 to 8 could be a remainder when dividing by 9.
It is a nonsense number. It could be meant to be 75, but that would be LXXV. It could also be intended to represent 25, (50-25) but the correct format would be XXV.
It is not a proper number. It could represent a number of possibilities. If vi = 6 and X=10 it could be 16, but the proper form would be XVI. If v=5 and ix = 9 it could be 14, but the proper form would be XIV.
There are a number of different amounts you could pay for a number of different things. You could pay thousands for a car.
No, the sum could be a whole number. 1 and 2/3 + 3 and 1/3 = 5
It could be the Roman numeral C that stands for 100
Any numeral from 0 to 8 could be a remainder when dividing by 9.
Calories are not a form of weight. It could be different amounts for different foods no-matter what the weight is.
It is a nonsense number. It could be meant to be 75, but that would be LXXV. It could also be intended to represent 25, (50-25) but the correct format would be XXV.
It is not a proper number. It could represent a number of possibilities. If vi = 6 and X=10 it could be 16, but the proper form would be XVI. If v=5 and ix = 9 it could be 14, but the proper form would be XIV.
A letter that stands for a number is called a variable. Any letter or value can be used as a variable.Im guessing, by the question, its a Roman Numeral. But the wording is bad. Will a supervisor edit that?
Please be a little more specific. This could be ANYTHING. Different minerals are found in smaller amounts than in soil...?
The Romans had no numeral for the value zero, so '0' could not be represented by a numeral. However in the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, introduced the numeral N (from the Latin Nulae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.
In proper notation it would be 1900 - MCM the shortest and highest number. You could say MIM, but that would not be proper, but it could be read as 1999.
It is a nonsense number that doesn't make sense. If you split it up it could be XL-CDLXVI 40 - 446