Wiki User
∙ 7y agoYou expand the parenthesis out first. Then simplify the rest.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoParenthesis
Yes, and parenthesis are the first thing you solve.
Use the quadratic formula for the equality. Then, depending on the coefficient of x2 and the nature of the inequality [>, ≥, ≤, <], determine whether you need the open or closed intervals between the roots or beyond the roots.
You square the number in the parentheses.
you can use it
It depends on which compound interest formula you mean. Refer to the Wikipedia Article on "Compound Interest" for the correct terminology.
You should solve for an empirical formula when you are given the percent composition of elements in a compound or when you have the molar mass of the compound but not the molecular formula. The empirical formula provides the simplest whole-number ratio of atoms in a compound.
Parenthesis
Yes, and parenthesis are the first thing you solve.
This is not an inequality. There is no <,>, or = sign.
Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution. -33+x<-33
There is no equation not inequality. So there is nothing to solve!
sin(arcsin(2/3)) = 2/3, since sin is the inverse function of arcsin.
The above is not an inequality as stated.
x>-9
Parentheses is when you are doing an equation, and you solve the problem.
I would not waste my time, because that's not an inequality.