Not necessarily.
I measure my height to 3 sig figs (for example 178 cm), but I may choose to report is as 180 cm (to 2 sf).
the precision of the answer must have the same number of significant digits as the measurement with the least significant digits- the site explains the rules and how to identify significant digits
No, it is not true. They reflect the precision of the number in the context of its use. If required to calculate the population density of Greater London in 2011, I would use the population in millions - not because that is the limit of the accuracy of the census results but because greater accuracy does not add significant value to the precision of the population density.
The significant digits are: 3701; so there are four such digits in the measurement. These are the digits that convey the degree of precision included. Leading zeroes and trailing zeroes do not add such meaning.
false.!!!I would have to disagree with this answer!! The member did not explain themselves!! I would have to say the answer is "TRUE"!!! Any feedback on this topic? Anyone care to respond, have discussion?I am also sure that the answer is true; see the link bellow.
significant digits
the precision of the answer must have the same number of significant digits as the measurement with the least significant digits- the site explains the rules and how to identify significant digits
Significant digits in measurement refer to the digits in a number that carry meaning or contribute to the precision of the measurement. They indicate the level of certainty in a measurement and help determine the accuracy of the result. The more significant digits in a measurement, the more precise the measurement is considered to be.
No, it is not true. They reflect the precision of the number in the context of its use. If required to calculate the population density of Greater London in 2011, I would use the population in millions - not because that is the limit of the accuracy of the census results but because greater accuracy does not add significant value to the precision of the population density.
the precision of the answer must have the same number of significant digits as the measurement with the least significant digits- the site explains the rules and how to identify significant digits
Significant digits in measurement refer to the digits in a number that carry meaning or contribute to the precision of the measurement. They indicate the level of accuracy or certainty in a measurement, with each significant digit representing a reliable and known value.
The significant digits are: 3701; so there are four such digits in the measurement. These are the digits that convey the degree of precision included. Leading zeroes and trailing zeroes do not add such meaning.
The term for eliminating digits that are not significant is called rounding or truncating. This process involves reducing the number of digits in a calculation to match the precision of the measurement.
rounded to a certain number of decimal places for consistency and ease of communication. It's important to consider the context and purpose of the measurement when determining how to round. Rounding can help prevent misinterpretation and allow for easier comparison of results.
The least count of a measuring instrument is the smallest value that can be measured with the instrument. It determines the precision of the measurement. Significant figures, on the other hand, are the digits in a number that carry meaning about the precision of the measurement. The number of significant figures in a measurement is related to the least count of the instrument used to make that measurement.
If the measurement was of such precision that the zero to the right of the 3 could be measured with accuracy, then it has two significant digits {30}.
157.725 ml is the answer if 0.6667 is an exact measurement. If it's an actual measurement, you only have 4 significant digits of precision, and the answer is 157.7 milliliters.
their both based on units of measure