answersLogoWhite

0

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Square root of x to the 5th?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Is the square root of x and the square root of NEGATIVE x both rational and irrational?

Yes, because when x equals 1, the square root of x is rational and the square root of -x is irrational, and when x equals -1, the square root of x is irrational and the square root of -x is rational.


The square root of 3y divided by the square root of x?

The fraction must be rationalized. Since it is the square root of x in the denominator, you are going to multiply the numerator and denominator by the square root of x. For simplicity of the problem, root will take the place of the symbol for square root: root(3y)/root(x) root(3y)*root(x)/root(x)*root(x) root(3xy)/x The simplified answer is going to be the square root of 3xy divided by x. Hope that helped.


What is the square root of 5square root of 5 square root of 5 and so on?

It seems to be 25. Call your number "x". x = 5 square root of (5 square root of (5 ...) Square it; this will eliminate the outermost square root sign: x squared = 25 times 5 square root of (5 square root of (... Dividing the second equation by the first one, you get: x squared / x = 25 x / x x = 25


What is the square root of x times the square root of 2x?

Its the square root of 2 times x Ambiguous. More clear is x times square root of 2


What is the square root of c to 5th power?

This question is unclear.You could be asking for the square root of ( c5 )or alternatively for ( the square root of c )5Also are you intending for c to be as in the speed of light - if not, why not use x?