The answer is no the diagonals do not have to bisect each other. That does not necessarily mean that there isn't a quadrilateral that has bisecting diagonals. A quadrilateral is a four-sided polygon which is a close plane figure; in this case with four sides. Meaning that all ends of the straight lines that configure a polygon must connect someway, somehow.
True
A rectangle is an example of a quadrilateral where the diagonals are congruent and bisect each other. However, a kite is a quadrilateral that can also have congruent diagonals, but they do not bisect each other. In a kite, one diagonal bisects the other at a right angle, while the other diagonal remains unequal in length. Therefore, while both shapes can have congruent diagonals, only the rectangle has diagonals that bisect each other.
may or may not be
If you are talking about the diagonals of a quadrilateral, the only quadrilateral that have diagonals that are perpendicular and bisect each other is a square, because a rectangle has bisecting diagonals, while a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. And a square fits in both of these categories.
diagonals.
True
True
always
true
The missing word is "bisect".
A quadrilateral is a parallelogram if and only if its diagonals bisect each other (this should be in any geometry book)
Square, Rhombus
may or may not be
If you are talking about the diagonals of a quadrilateral, the only quadrilateral that have diagonals that are perpendicular and bisect each other is a square, because a rectangle has bisecting diagonals, while a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. And a square fits in both of these categories.
Square
diagonals.
the anser to this question is a trapiezuim as it could have right angles and its diagonals definatly do not bisect each other