answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

648 rounded to the nearest hundred is 600.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The rounding nearest hundred of 648?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Does and estimate rounding by the nearest ten more accurate than rounding by the nearest hundred?

Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.


How do you round two and one fifth?

The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.


What is 3961 rounded up to the nearest hundred?

Since the question asks about rounding up rather than simply rounding, the answer is 3.97


What is the greatest possible whole number that can be rounded off to 600?

-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.


Which is better rounding off to nearest ten or rounding off to nearest hundred?

There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.

Related questions

Does 648 round down or round up to the nearest hundred?

648 rounds up to the nearest hundred. When rounding to the nearest hundred, you look at the digit in the tens place, which is 4 in this case. Since 4 is less than 5, the hundreds digit remains the same and the tens and ones digits become zero. Therefore, 648 rounds up to 700.


What is the smallest whole number that rounds to 800?

If rounding to the nearest ten: 795 If rounding to the nearest hundred: 750


Does and estimate rounding by the nearest ten more accurate than rounding by the nearest hundred?

Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.


How do you round two and one fifth?

The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.


What is 3961 rounded up to the nearest hundred?

Since the question asks about rounding up rather than simply rounding, the answer is 3.97


How do you round 10π?

Depends on what you are rounding to. Rounding to the nearest whole number, it is 10. Rounding to the nearest tens, it is still 10. Rounding to the nearest hundred, it is zero.


What does 115 round up to the nearest hundred?

The nearest hundred to 115 is 100. That would be rounding down. The nearest hundred rounding up is 200.


What is better rounding off to nearest ten or rounding off to nearest hundred?

In whole numbers, rounding to the nearest ten is better. And in decimals, rounding to the nearest hundreth is more accurate.


Does 147 round to 100?

Yes, if you are rounding to the nearest hundred. No, if you are rounding to the nearest ten.


What would you round 415 to?

That would depend on what you were rounding it to. If rounding to the nearest whole number, then it does not need rounding. If rounding to the nearest ten, it would be 420. If rounding to the nearest hundred, it would be 400.


What is the greatest possible whole number that can be rounded off to 600?

-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.


Which is better rounding off to nearest ten or rounding off to nearest hundred?

There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.