Increasing positive nuclear charge
It will be bigger than if the radius were 20 mi and smaller than if it were 22 mi.
No, 0.31 is not smaller than 0.206. In fact, 0.31 is larger than 0.206.
The answer will depend on whether the larger cylinder is 4 times larger in terms of radius, cross-sectional area, or volume. If radius, multiply the smaller radius by 4. If cross-sectional area, multiply the smaller radius by 2. If volume, you do not have enough information.
Volume of a cylinder is given by the formula: V = πr2hIt is important to keep in mind that:If r is doubled then volume becomes four times....(1)Volume of the cylinder with radius of 2.5 units is equal to π(2.5)2h and volume of the cylinder with radius of 5 units is equal to 4π(2.5)2h. (By using the fact (1))So, it is clear that volume of the cylinder with greater radius is 4 times the volume of the cylinder with smaller radius.
Use the fact that the diameter is twice the radius. d = r - 4; replacing for d, 2r = r - 4
the positive ionic radius is smaller than the neutral atomic radius
The radius is smaller than the ulna
Smaller
The atomic radius of a cation is smaller than that of its original atom. See the related link for an image example of what this may look like.
No, only if the diameter is bigger than the radius is the radius smaller than the diameter.
Potassium's atomic radius is smaller than rubidium's because potassium has fewer energy levels of electrons.
The radius of strontium is smaller than the radius of rubidium.
Sodium(Na) has smaller radius than Bromine because Na has less number of shells.
The positive ionic radius is smaller than the neutral atomic radius
Na+ is smaller than Na.
Yes. The radius is one-half of the diameter.
Magnesium's atomic radius is smaller than Calcium's.