The sequence 36912 does not follow a simple arithmetic or geometric pattern, making it challenging to express with a straightforward algebraic formula. However, if we examine the differences between consecutive terms (3 to 6, 6 to 9, 9 to 1, and 1 to 2), we can observe that the differences are 3, 3, -8, and 1. This suggests a more complex relationship, possibly requiring a piecewise function or a polynomial to represent it accurately. Overall, without more context or a clear rule governing the sequence, it’s difficult to pinpoint a single algebraic expression.
If you mean 3, 6, 9, 12 then the nth term is 3n
The number after 36912 is 36913
They can all be divided by 3
The only proper subset of a set comprising one element, is the null set.
1, 3 1, 2, 3, 6 1, 3, 9 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 769, 1538, 2307, 3076, 4614, 6152, 9228, 12304, 18456, 36912