answersLogoWhite

0

The sequence 36912 does not follow a simple arithmetic or geometric pattern, making it challenging to express with a straightforward algebraic formula. However, if we examine the differences between consecutive terms (3 to 6, 6 to 9, 9 to 1, and 1 to 2), we can observe that the differences are 3, 3, -8, and 1. This suggests a more complex relationship, possibly requiring a piecewise function or a polynomial to represent it accurately. Overall, without more context or a clear rule governing the sequence, it’s difficult to pinpoint a single algebraic expression.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

What else can I help you with?