answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The north got what it really wanted: The union was saved, and the federal properties in the south were back in the possession of the federal government. Freed blacks were abandoned and allowed to drift back into virtual slavery, because ending slavery was never the reason the north mounted military operations against the south.

It was not a healing time. It was a time in which the Republican-dominated Congress forced some harsh conditions upon the south. Andrew Johnson wanted to carry on with Lincoln's relatively benign policies toward the post-war south, but Congress was in a mood for vengeance, so they impeached Johnson on trumped up charges in an attempt to neutralize his influence.

Later, when Grant became president, he sent U.S. troops south to enforce the integration laws just as Eisenhower did almost one hundred years later, but the northern population and certainly the southern population were not yet ready for such federal action, so every president backed off of such action until Eisenhower tried it. This attempt to use force to integrate blacks into mainstream society is a large part of the reason Grant was considered our worst president for so many years. (His brother stealing money from the Bureau of Indian Affairs didn't help President Grant's reputation any.)

Back then, reconstruction was a reference to reconstructing the Union; as soon as all of the Confederate states had been re-admitted to the Union, people back then considered reconstruction completed. It wasn't until later that reconstruction started to take on connotations of social reconstruction and integration.

User Avatar

Izabella Muller

Lvl 9
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The north got what it really wanted: The union was saved, and the federal properties in the south were back in the possession of the federal government. Freed blacks were abandoned and allowed to drift back into virtual slavery, because ending slavery was never the reason the north mounted military operations against the south.

It was not a healing time. It was a time in which the Republican-dominated Congress forced some harsh conditions upon the south. Andrew Johnson wanted to carry on with Lincoln's relatively benign policies toward the post-war south, but Congress was in a mood for vengeance, so they impeached Johnson on trumped up charges in an attempt to neutralize his influence.

Later, when Grant became president, he sent U.S. troops south to enforce the integration laws just as Eisenhower did almost one hundred years later, but the northern population and certainly the southern population were not yet ready for such federal action, so every president backed off of such action until Eisenhower tried it. This attempt to use force to integrate blacks into mainstream society is a large part of the reason Grant was considered our worst president for so many years. (His brother stealing money from the Bureau of Indian Affairs didn't help President Grant's reputation any.)

Back then, reconstruction was a reference to reconstructing the Union; as soon as all of the Confederate states had been re-admitted to the Union, people back then considered reconstruction completed. It wasn't until later that reconstruction started to take on connotations of social reconstruction and integration.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are 3 outcomes as a result of reconstruction?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are 3 outcomes as a resuly of the Reconstruction?

what are 3 outcomes as a result of Reconstruction


What occured as a result of reconstruction?

what occurd as a result of reconstruction


What are some pros and cons of the reconstruction era?

What are some negative and positive outcomes of the reconstruction era?


What were two positive outcomes of the reconstruction?

Ku Klux Klan was formed to kill all the blacks.


What does outcomes?

It means what happened or the result of something.


For a given event what is the result of dividing the number of successful outcomes by the number of possible outcomes?

Probability


If you have 5 football matches with 3 outcomes win lose or draw how many different combinations are there?

3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 15 total possible outcomes. You can 'prove' this by laying out a table of possibles where a user might tick the result of each game..... Match....1....2....3....4....5 Win......._...._...._...._...._ Lose......_...._...._...._...._ Draw....._...._...._...._...._


What was the result of southern conservative resistance to reconstruction?

They started to troll


How was the Southern economy revolutionized as a result of Reconstruction activities?

bh


A major result of the Reconstruction period was that?

A major result the Reconstruction period in the South was many unscrupulous people took advantage of those that lost the war. However, it did establish fairer laws for African Americans.


A fair coin is tossed 3 times how many possible outcomes are there?

Each toss has 2 outcomes; so the number of outcomes for 3 tosses is 2*2*2 = 8


What is the difference between output and out comes?

Output is what is produced. Outcomes are the result of the output