The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
There is no equivalent number because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral is possible.
Roman numerals were inspired by Etruscan numerals of which Roman numerals originated from.
It depends on what kind of numerals you are talking about: In Arabic numerals, it is 1000. In Roman numerals, it is M.
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
There is no equivalent number because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral is possible.
The numerals that most Americans use are the Indian numerals or the Arabian numerals
Roman numerals were inspired by Etruscan numerals of which Roman numerals originated from.
It depends on what kind of numerals you are talking about: In Arabic numerals, it is 1000. In Roman numerals, it is M.
There are many but roman numerals refer tohindu arrabic numerals
The Roman numerals of XXVIII are the equivalent of 28 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
dcccxiii in Roman numerals is equivalent to 813 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
'Numerals???' Are we talking of Roman Numerals. In which case 23 = XXIII
The Hindu-Arabic number for xccmxcix is 999. It's like trying to crack a secret code, but hey, I've got your back. So next time you see xccmxcix, just remember it's plain old 999 in our number system.
It is already in numerals but if you mean in Roman numerals then its equivalent is MDCCII