If by box you mean a cuboid shaped box, then the smallest surface area is a cube of side 2641/3 ~= 6.42 in (of approx 246.92 sq in).
If there is no limitation on the interpretation of the shape of the box, then the smallest surface area is a sphere of radius (3/4 x 264 / {pi})1/3 = (198 / {pi})1/3 ~= 3.98in (of approx 199.02 sq in)..
Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.
5x4x4 Volume=80 Surface Area=112
No, doubling the volume of a rectangular prism does not necessarily double the surface area. The relationship between volume and surface area depends on the dimensions of the prism. For example, if you double the height while keeping the base area constant, the volume increases, but the surface area may not double. The specific changes in dimensions will determine the new surface area.
Yes, volume increases faster than surface area as the size of an object increases. For geometric shapes, while surface area grows with the square of the dimensions (length, width, height), volume grows with the cube of those dimensions. This means that as an object becomes larger, its volume expands at a higher rate compared to its surface area, leading to a relatively smaller surface area-to-volume ratio.
It means that someone has recorded the dimensions of a thin object with rather a large area, possibly with the aim of calculating its volume. However, it is equally possible that the dimensions are recorded to establish its surface area (for painting?).
The answer will depend on formula for WHAT! Its dimensions, surface area, volume, principal diagonal, mass. And on what information is available.The answer will depend on formula for WHAT! Its dimensions, surface area, volume, principal diagonal, mass. And on what information is available.The answer will depend on formula for WHAT! Its dimensions, surface area, volume, principal diagonal, mass. And on what information is available.The answer will depend on formula for WHAT! Its dimensions, surface area, volume, principal diagonal, mass. And on what information is available.
Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.Volume and surface area can never be the same because volume is a measure in 3-dimensional space whereas area is a measure in 2-dimensional space. The dimensions are different and so equality is not possible.
A sphere has the lowest surface area to volume ratio of all geometric shapes. This is because the sphere is able to enclose the largest volume with the smallest surface area due to its symmetrical shape.
5x4x4 Volume=80 Surface Area=112
No, doubling the volume of a rectangular prism does not necessarily double the surface area. The relationship between volume and surface area depends on the dimensions of the prism. For example, if you double the height while keeping the base area constant, the volume increases, but the surface area may not double. The specific changes in dimensions will determine the new surface area.
IDK
A sphere has the lowest surface area to volume ratio compared to other shapes because it has the smallest surface area for a given volume. This is due to its symmetrical shape, which minimizes the surface area while maximizing the volume. The sphere's surface area is spread out evenly in all directions, making it more compact and efficient.
You cannot, unless you know what the shape is. For a very few regular shapes, the volume can provide information on the linear dimensions of the object. But even for something as simple as a cuboid (but not a cube), that does not work - there are an infinite number of possible measures for the length/breadth/height which will give the same volume. Once you have these linear dimensions, determining the surface area is a lot more straightforward.
This question cannot be answered in a sensible way. A surface area has dimensions [L2]. The volume has dimensions [L3]. Basic dimensional analysis teaches that you cannot convert between measures with different dimensions without additional information.
No, rectangular prisms with the same volume do not necessarily have the same surface area. The surface area depends on the dimensions of the prism, which can vary even if the volume remains constant. For example, a long, thin prism and a short, wide prism can both have the same volume but different surface areas. Thus, while volume is a fixed quantity, surface area can differ based on the specific dimensions used.
Yes, volume increases faster than surface area as the size of an object increases. For geometric shapes, while surface area grows with the square of the dimensions (length, width, height), volume grows with the cube of those dimensions. This means that as an object becomes larger, its volume expands at a higher rate compared to its surface area, leading to a relatively smaller surface area-to-volume ratio.
It means that someone has recorded the dimensions of a thin object with rather a large area, possibly with the aim of calculating its volume. However, it is equally possible that the dimensions are recorded to establish its surface area (for painting?).