55
The answer depends on where, within the sequence, the missing number should have been.
To find the missing number in the sequence 16, 4, 12, 36, 9, 27, 44, 11, we can look for a pattern. The first set of numbers appears to alternate between two sequences: the first sequence (16, 12, 9, 44) and the second sequence (4, 36, 27, 11). Following this pattern, the missing number, which follows the last number in the second sequence (11), should be 33. Thus, the missing number is 33.
The pattern between the numbers is: 11, 12 and 13
12 24 36 48, that would be 12
They're the first prime numbers minus 1 -- except that 10 is missing.
The Answer is 26
55
The answer depends on where, within the sequence, the missing number should have been.
23
number of composite numbers below 20: 10composite numbers below 20: 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18
11
12 ****************************** 11, 16, 22 are the 3 numbers continuing the pattern.
You use a different value!
The next numbers in the sequences are 48, 96, 192, 384, etc. The pattern is that each subsequent number is a doubling of the previous number.
-4, -8, -12 and so on.
The pattern between the numbers is: 11, 12 and 13