2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 ... etc
The equivalent is 7s+2s = 9s
It simplifies to: 2s+4R
9r2-4s2/9r+6sIt looks like you can factors the numerator(3r + 2s)(3r - 2s) [This is the factored form of 9r2-4s2]Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/9r+6sYou can also factor the denominator3(3r+2s)Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/3(3r+2s)You can cancel out the 3r+2s on top and bottom because they are the same they equal 1. Therefore your final answer is3r-2s over 3You could go further and say this is...r-(2/3)seither one is correct
A = (s, 2s), B = (3s, 8s) The midpoint of AB is C = [(s + 3s)/2, (2s + 8s)/2] = [4s/2, 10s/2] = (2s, 5s) Gradient of AB = (8s - 2s)/(3s - s) = 6s/2s = 3 Gradient of perpendicular to AB = -1/(slope AB) = -1/3 Now, line through C = (2s, 5s) with gradient -1/3 is y - 5s = -1/3*(x - 2s) = 1/3*(2s - x) or 3y - 15s = 2s - x or x + 3y = 17s
5s - 6 = 2s, ie 5s - 2s = 6, ie 3s = 6, ie s = 2
yes but it costs tou to transfer them
When the denominator of the fraction is a simple multiple of 2s and 5s.
Yes, you can file your taxes with two W-2s from the same employer if you worked different jobs or had multiple positions with varying tax withholdings.
4s2 - 9 can be expressed by using the identity: a2 - b2 = (a-b)(a+b) Therefore, 4s2 - 9 = (2s)2 - 32 = (2s-3)(2s+3)
The equivalent is 7s+2s = 9s
2s - 12 + 2s = 4s - 124s - 12 = 4s - 124s = 4ss = s==========this is an identity and any number can be s
2s + 16 = 4s - 6 Subtract 2s from both sides: 16 = 2s - 6 Add 6 to both sides: 22 = 2s divide both sides by 2: s = 11
2, 4, 6 3, 6 The LCM of 2 and 3 is 6.
Having multiple W-2s is not inherently bad for your taxes. However, it can make your tax situation more complex and may require additional attention to ensure accurate reporting of all income.
There is only one 2s orbital in an atom.
It simplifies to: 2s+4R
9r2-4s2/9r+6sIt looks like you can factors the numerator(3r + 2s)(3r - 2s) [This is the factored form of 9r2-4s2]Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/9r+6sYou can also factor the denominator3(3r+2s)Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/3(3r+2s)You can cancel out the 3r+2s on top and bottom because they are the same they equal 1. Therefore your final answer is3r-2s over 3You could go further and say this is...r-(2/3)seither one is correct