the negative is that people had to use their hands to bury anything and the positive was that they got payed for it.
is that both grasslands and clearing forests for farming are both negative and effective to the environment because the forests are what pollutes the air for us to breath with oxygen and that gives us nitrogen that we both need
It is neither. It is just a phrase coined by animal rights activists to refer to large-scale animal agriculture, though it certainly has very negative connotations.
I tell you. It is very simple. Air pollution. only STUPID people do not know the answer. Then come and ASK the question.
In some areas that are naturally abundant with plant life and grow many varieties of flora, farming has taken place and has caused much of the land to be clear of its natural vegetation. In other less arid regions, farming has transformed desolate deserts and grasslands into lush, crop-yielding land.
There is no such thing as "inorganic" farming. There's farming, then there's organic farming.
Farming can have both positive and negative impacts on the environment. Positive impacts include preserving green spaces and providing wildlife habitats. However, negative impacts can include deforestation for agriculture, water pollution from pesticides and fertilizers, and greenhouse gas emissions from livestock. Sustainable farming practices can mitigate these negative effects on the environment.
Wool can be considered both negative and positive depending on context. Negative aspects could include environmental concerns related to land use and water consumption for sheep farming, as well as potential animal welfare issues. However, wool is also valued for its sustainability, biodegradability, and durability, making it a positive choice for many consumers seeking natural and renewable materials.
Organic farming is much more labor intensive than non-organic farming and is often more expensive to do.
it affects the environment because there might still be animals on the farm
organic farming
the negative is that people had to use their hands to bury anything and the positive was that they got payed for it.
Farming can have both positive and negative effects on soil. Positive effects include nutrient inputs from organic matter and crop residues, while negative effects can include soil erosion, compaction, and depletion of soil nutrients if not managed properly. Sustainable farming practices, such as crop rotation and cover cropping, can help mitigate these negative effects and maintain soil health.
is that both grasslands and clearing forests for farming are both negative and effective to the environment because the forests are what pollutes the air for us to breath with oxygen and that gives us nitrogen that we both need
Both
It is neither. It is just a phrase coined by animal rights activists to refer to large-scale animal agriculture, though it certainly has very negative connotations.
This question cannot be answered due to its self-contradictory nature. "Farming" is the growing of plants or animals, and "inorganic" means non-living. You can't grow something that is not alive.