No because it has more than 2 factors
228 is a composite number and not a prime numberr.
144 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 228 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 19
448 / 2224 / 2112 / 256 / 228 / 214 / 2726*7 = 448Your answer is 6. ■
Yes because 6 and 38 are factors of 228 and 6*38 = 228
228 and 418 are not relatively prime because they have common factors greater than 1.
As a product of its prime factors: 2*2*3*19 = 228
No because it has more than 2 factors
228 is a composite number and not a prime numberr.
228 is a composite number. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 have a different name.
The common factors of 228 and 32 are: 1, 2, 4.
144 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 228 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 19
Since 114 is a factor of 228, all of its factors are common.
The factors of 456 are: 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 19 24 38 57 76 114 152 228 456 The prime factors are: 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 19
448 / 2224 / 2112 / 256 / 228 / 214 / 2726*7 = 448Your answer is 6. ■
There is not a greatest common factor of a single number, such as 228, because there cannot be a greatest common factor without two or more numbers to compare. Common factors are factors that the numbers being compared have in common. The greatest common factor is the largest factor that all the numbers being compared have in common. Thus, since there are not two or more numbers to compare, there are neither common factors nor a greatest common factor. The factors of 228 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 19, 38, 57, 76, 114, and 228. The prime factors of 228 are 2, 2, 3, and 19. Examples: The greatest common factor of 24 and 228 is 12. The greatest common factor of 57 and 228 is 57. The greatest common factor of 98 and 228 is 2. The greatest common factor of 169 and 228 is 1.
2 x 2 x 3 x 19 = 228