The Romans themselves would have used I, II, III, IIII, V. However more recent conventions replaced IIII with IV.
Decimals cannot be written in Roman numerals. Roman numerals correspond to whole, real, positive integers.Cannot be roman numerals:1/5-5-1/50.15-0.15Can be roman numerals1510501005001000
4 in Roman numerals can be IIII (4) or IV (5-1)
(v)i = 1000*5+1 = 5001
Roman Numerals: X=10 V=5 I=1 so... 10*3=30 5*1=5 1*2=2 30+5+2=37
MMVII is the number 2007 in Roman numerals. MMVII would be the roman numeral for 2007. M = 1,000 V = 5 I = 1
Decimals cannot be written in Roman numerals. Roman numerals correspond to whole, real, positive integers.Cannot be roman numerals:1/5-5-1/50.15-0.15Can be roman numerals1510501005001000
4 in Roman numerals can be IIII (4) or IV (5-1)
(v)i = 1000*5+1 = 5001
Roman Numerals: X=10 V=5 I=1 so... 10*3=30 5*1=5 1*2=2 30+5+2=37
MMVII is the number 2007 in Roman numerals. MMVII would be the roman numeral for 2007. M = 1,000 V = 5 I = 1
7 = 5 + 1 + 1 = VII
1006 in Roman numerals is MVIDDVI (500+500+5+1 = 1006) but 1006 in Roman numerals is normally MVI (1000+5+1 = 1006)
Here is the table of Roman Numerals. M = 1000 D = 500 C = 100 L = 50 X = 10 V = 5 ( THe answer to your question). I = 1
The Roman numerals VIIII (5+1+1+1+1=9) represents the number 9 and they can be simplified to IX (-1+10=9)
The equivalent of 1 to 5 in Roman numerals are I, II, III, IIII or IV and V respectively
Roman numerals were the Roman's system of numbers. Such as we have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc... Those were there numbering system
dcccxviii (in capital letters) 500+100+100+100+10+5+1+1+1