It will be the same as dividing positives but if it is a negetive divided by a postive the answer will still be negative
no answer
It wasn't necessary to 'create' any rules. They follow logically from the definition of exponents.
The rules are not the same.Multiplication is commutative whereas division is not.Multiplication is associative whereas division is not.
It is dividing by 3
The rules are the same.
fgrfjkbfeb
It will be the same as dividing positives but if it is a negetive divided by a postive the answer will still be negative
no answer
Turn the fraction by which you are dividing upside down, that is make the top number (numerator) the bottom number (denominator) and the original denominator the new numerator); and thenmultiply the fractions.Example:3/7 ÷ 9/14⇒ 3/7 x 14/9 = 42/63= 2/3
It wasn't necessary to 'create' any rules. They follow logically from the definition of exponents.
The meeting in 1884 of 14 European nations to determine rules for dividing Africa was called the Berlin Conference. At this conference, rules were established for the colonization and division of Africa among the European powers.
The rules are not the same.Multiplication is commutative whereas division is not.Multiplication is associative whereas division is not.
It is dividing by 3
The question has no sensible answer because its proposition is not true. Multiplication is commutative, division is not, so the rules are NOT the same.
You can always check on the divisibility of a number by dividing it into another number. But if you know the divisibility rules, you can get that information easier and faster.
by dividing 3 into a number