They are just different names for the same shape.
* * * * *
Actually, they are not. A rhombus is a parallelogram with all its sides of the same length. It is, therefore a special kind of parallelogram. (Just like a square is a special kind of rectangle). So all properties of a parallelogram apply to a rhombus.
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but a parallelogram isn't always a rhombus. A rhombus is a parallelogram where all the lines are the same length.
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but something that is a parallelogram isn't necessarily a rhombus.
a parallelogram will never ever be a rhombus
A rhombus is always a parallelogram, by definition.
A rhombus is always a parallelogram!
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but a parallelogram isn't always a rhombus. A rhombus is a parallelogram where all the lines are the same length.
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but something that is a parallelogram isn't necessarily a rhombus.
A rhombus is a parallelogram.
a parallelogram will never ever be a rhombus
An equilateral parallelogram is a rhombus.
A rhombus is always a parallelogram, by definition.
A rhombus is always a parallelogram!
No. A rhombus is a type of parallelogram.
A square is a special case of a rhombus. A parallelogram is not a rhombus.
If the sides of a parallelogram are all of the same length then it is a rhombus. Thus, a rhombus is a special type of parallelogram.
Yes, that's a true statement.A rhombus is a special case of a parallelogram.
A rhombus is a special kind of parallelogram: one in which all sides are equal. It is not true to say that a parallelogram is never a rhombus.