"IIV" is not a valid representation in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, the correct representation of the number 7 is "VII," which is a combination of the symbols for 5 (V) and 2 (II). The subtractive principle in Roman numerals dictates that a smaller numeral before a larger one indicates subtraction, not addition.
It has the same value as: III = 3
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
The Roman numerals CIC represent 199.
Roman numerals represent numbers, they do not represent words.
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 299 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
It has the same value as: III = 3
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
The Roman numerals CIC represent 199.
Roman numerals represent numbers, they do not represent words.
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 299 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
I is the number 1 in Roman numerals.
There is no T in Roman numerals
In today's terms of notating Roman numerals they represent 649
It is already in Roman numerals and they represent 82
It is already in Roman numerals and they represent 1776
It's already in Roman numerals and in today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 1,099
XIX is 19 in Roman numerals.