a vertical one
if the speed is zero then the distance versus time line will be horizontal
the slope show the velocity of the object which show its direction and magnitude.
The slope of the line would decrease.
It usually shows the distance of an object from a fixed point over a time period. The distance is usually measured in one specific direction so that radial motion is ignored.
a vertical one
It is false
Yes it is.
if the speed is zero then the distance versus time line will be horizontal
the slope show the velocity of the object which show its direction and magnitude.
The slope of the line would decrease.
If the line formed by the graph is straight, the speed is constant. A horizontal line would show the object as stationary.
A distance-versus-time graph for a moving object would typically show distance on the y-axis and time on the x-axis. The slope of the graph represents the speed of the object; a steeper slope indicates higher speed, while a horizontal line would indicate that the object is not moving. The area under the graph represents the total distance traveled by the object.
It usually shows the distance of an object from a fixed point over a time period. The distance is usually measured in one specific direction so that radial motion is ignored.
it will never be a vertical line as the slope is velocity and that would be infinite speed
It is a measure of speed of the object, but only in the radial direction: that is, towards or away from the point from which distance is measured. The object could be going around that point in circular motion and the graph would show absolutely nothing.
If it is distance from a point versus time, with distance on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis, it would show a steep vertical climb on the graph. The steeper vertical change, the faster, but never completely vertical. Large "rise" (distance) over short "run" (time). With 0 acceleration, the graph is a straight line.