No, no multiple of 4 ends in 5; they all end in 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8.
Yes because 8 times 225 = 1800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To check for divisibility by 8 (ie whether a number is in the 8 times table): add the four times the hundreds digit to twice the tens digit to the ones digit; if this sum is divisible by 8, then so is the original number (and so the original number is in the 8 times table). For 1800 this gives 4 × 8 + 2 × 0 + 0 = 32 = 4 × 8, therefore 1800 is divisible by 8 (and thus in the 8 times table).
No, because the definition of a prime number is 'a number that can only be divided by one or itself, and still leave a whole number.' Anything in the eight times table would be divisible by two and four.
Because certain times tables always end in particular numbers. The numbers in the 10 times tables always end with a 0 e.g 10, 20, 30... The number in the 5 times tables always end with a 0 or 5 e.g. 5, 10, 15... The 2, 4, 6, 8 times tables will always end in even numbers. The 1 times table is obvious. The 9 times table always has digits that sum to 9 e.g. 9, 18, 27... The hardest times table is usually considered to be the 7 times table to learn as their is no obvious pattern to the numbers.
There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.
72 ... xx
No, no multiple of 4 ends in 5; they all end in 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8.
120
Yes because 8 times 225 = 1800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To check for divisibility by 8 (ie whether a number is in the 8 times table): add the four times the hundreds digit to twice the tens digit to the ones digit; if this sum is divisible by 8, then so is the original number (and so the original number is in the 8 times table). For 1800 this gives 4 × 8 + 2 × 0 + 0 = 32 = 4 × 8, therefore 1800 is divisible by 8 (and thus in the 8 times table).
It has to be present in the 8 times table - By revising your times table, you will find it quite easy to work out division sums. :)
For a times table you have to put a star.if you look at the number keys on top of number 8 press shift and number 8 and the star comes like this * for example 2*7=14
No, because the definition of a prime number is 'a number that can only be divided by one or itself, and still leave a whole number.' Anything in the eight times table would be divisible by two and four.
Because certain times tables always end in particular numbers. The numbers in the 10 times tables always end with a 0 e.g 10, 20, 30... The number in the 5 times tables always end with a 0 or 5 e.g. 5, 10, 15... The 2, 4, 6, 8 times tables will always end in even numbers. The 1 times table is obvious. The 9 times table always has digits that sum to 9 e.g. 9, 18, 27... The hardest times table is usually considered to be the 7 times table to learn as their is no obvious pattern to the numbers.
Oxygen is number 8 in the periodic table.
There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.There are no two numbers, both in the 8 and 3 times table, that add to 60.
anything in the 8 times table
8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88,96!