The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct
If the hypotenuse of a right triangle is congruent to the corresponding part of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent. ========================================== Another contributor, in shock, stopped by to point out: That may (or may not) be a "hypotenuse theorem", but you really need to be careful trying to use it, because it's not true!
If three angles of one triangle are congruent to three angles of another triangle then by the AAA similarity theorem, the two triangles are similar. Actually, you need only two angles of one triangle being congruent to two angle of the second triangle.
No, something could be similar to something else, but be bigger. To be congruent they need to be the exactly the same.
AC is congruent to DF.
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
For a start, you would need to know what efg and jkl are.
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
Bc= qr
Su jL
bc yz
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
Line segment BC is congruent to Line Segment YZ