71,73,79
19, 20, 21
There are no three consecutive numbers that are squares. Otherwise, there are an infinite sets of squares of three consecutive numbers: for example, {1,4,9}, or {4,9,16} or {576, 625, 676}
64 + 66 + 68 = 198
30+32+34=96
If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.
10 + 11 + 12 = 33
99, 100, and 101
71,73,79
There are no three consecutive numbers with a sum of 170.
Let's denote the three consecutive numbers as x, x+1, and x+2. Since the sum of these three numbers is 150, we can write the equation x + (x+1) + (x+2) = 150. Simplifying this equation gives us 3x + 3 = 150. Solving for x, we get x = 49. Therefore, the three consecutive numbers are 49, 50, and 51.
There are no sets of three consecutive numbers totaling 118.
19, 20, 21
41,43,45 is the answer
There are no three consecutive numbers that are squares. Otherwise, there are an infinite sets of squares of three consecutive numbers: for example, {1,4,9}, or {4,9,16} or {576, 625, 676}
This is no set of three consecutive numbers that when multiplied equal 387.
The numbers are 9, 10 and 11.