Since 8 is less than 37, 8/37 cannot be expressed as an improper fraction.
8/13 is a proper fraction. Proper fractions can't become improper.
17/4
3
when a numorator is lager than a denominator for example 8/2 is an improper fraction
The absolute value of the fraction is less than 1 so it is not an improper fraction.-0.375 = -3/8The absolute value of the fraction is less than 1 so it is not an improper fraction.-0.375 = -3/8The absolute value of the fraction is less than 1 so it is not an improper fraction.-0.375 = -3/8The absolute value of the fraction is less than 1 so it is not an improper fraction.-0.375 = -3/8
Since 8 is less than 37, 8/37 cannot be expressed as an improper fraction.
The magnitude of 8/415 is less than 1 and so there is no sensible way of expressing it as an improper fraction.
8/13 is a proper fraction. Proper fractions can't become improper.
17/4
3
The absolute value of the given fraction is less than 1. Therefore it is not a muxed fraction and it is not possible to represent it as an improper fraction.
when a numorator is lager than a denominator for example 8/2 is an improper fraction
Assuming you mean 8/42 then no. An improper fraction is one where the numerator is greater than the denominator; 8 (the numerator) us less than 42 (the denominator, so it is not an improper fraction. 8/42 can be simplified as there is a common factor of 2, giving 8/42 = 4/21.
WE just have to check if the numerator is greater than the denominator. Eg: 8/3 is an improper fraction. Every mixed fraction is an improper fraction.
16/2 is a fraction that is not an improper fraction is and is equal to 8. * * * * * 16/2 IS an improper fraction! Since the absolute value of 8 is greater than 1, any fractional representation must be improper.
16/2Is one example of the value 8 as an improper fraction (a fraction with the numerator larger than the denominator)