If the pattern has an ellipsis, after the last comma.
A terminating number has a definitive value - A repeating number continues indefinitely. For example - 10 divided by 8 is 0.125 (a terminating number) - 10 divided by 3 is 3.333333 (the decimal repeats indefinitely).
No, if a decimal does not terminate or repeat, it is not a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, and their decimal representation either terminates or repeats after a certain point. Decimals that do not have a pattern and continue indefinitely are considered irrational numbers.
Any number that either terminates or repeats the same pattern over and over is rational - and vice versa: any rational number either terminates, or repeats.
The number 4.666666 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction, specifically ( \frac{14}{3} ). It is also a decimal number, with a repeating decimal part (the "6" repeats indefinitely). Additionally, it is a real number since all rational numbers are part of the real number system.
Yes, the number 6.415418 repeating is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. The repeating decimal indicates that the digits after the decimal point continue indefinitely in a predictable pattern, which is a characteristic of rational numbers. Therefore, it can be represented in the form of ( \frac{p}{q} ), where ( p ) and ( q ) are integers, and ( q ) is not zero.
1.6666 (the number 6 repeats indefinitely).
A repeating decimal is a decimal that contains a series of numbers that repeat indefinitely. Examples include: 3.44444... 4.565656... 2.356356356... An ellipsis (...) at the end of the decimal signals that it repeats indefinitely.
55.5556
A terminating number has a definitive value - A repeating number continues indefinitely. For example - 10 divided by 8 is 0.125 (a terminating number) - 10 divided by 3 is 3.333333 (the decimal repeats indefinitely).
no, rational numbers have a pattern that repeats, this number doesn't.
No, if a decimal does not terminate or repeat, it is not a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, and their decimal representation either terminates or repeats after a certain point. Decimals that do not have a pattern and continue indefinitely are considered irrational numbers.
I would say no, it is rational. A number is only irrational if it repeats with no specific pattern.
Any number that either terminates or repeats the same pattern over and over is rational - and vice versa: any rational number either terminates, or repeats.
Terminating
If you write it in decimal, it will continue indefinitely, without a regular repeating pattern.
No, but it is the number that repeats most in statistics.
If you mean to continue the pattern indefinitely, adding more digits, and one more "1" in every cycle, then it is NOT rational. In the case of a rational number, the EXACT SAME group of digits has to repeat over and over (perhaps after some other, initial, digits), for example:0.45113113113113113... Here, the group of digits "113" repeats over and over, so the number is rational.