Itself 9 which is an integer or a whole number but its factors are 1, 3 and 9
One third of nine is an integer and not a fraction.
no it is an improper fraction
If you're counting down, then the next integer (whole number) is "a hundred million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-eight". If you're counting up, then the next integer is "two hundred million".
suppose you mean 'integer'. nine hundred and ninety-nine (999)
It is multiplied by nine.
Itself 9 which is an integer or a whole number but its factors are 1, 3 and 9
It is increased nine fold. New Area = 9*old area.
No, it is an integer.
One third of nine is an integer and not a fraction.
Yes, -9 is an integer as it is not a fraction, being a whole number.
no it is an improper fraction
The formula for Kinetic Energy of an object is mv2/2 where m: mass of object and v:velocity of object Therefore when the speed of an object is tripled, then its kinetic energy becomes 9 times
29000 is an integer, not a fraction.
If you're counting down, then the next integer (whole number) is "a hundred million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-eight". If you're counting up, then the next integer is "two hundred million".
suppose you mean 'integer'. nine hundred and ninety-nine (999)
No, the square root of an integer will not always be an integer. It may or may not be. The square root of nine is three, both of which are integers. The square root of two is not an integer. In fact, it is not even a rational number.