answersLogoWhite

0

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is -10x-x?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What does the roman numeral xviii stand for?

18Roman Numeral Decimali 1ii 2iii 3iv 4v 5vi 6vii 7viii 8ix 9x 10xx 20xxx 30xviii = 10 + 5 + 3 = 18


List roman numerals from 2000 - 3000?

MM = 2000MMM = 3000C = 100CC = 200CCC = 300CD = 400D = 500DC = 600DCC = 700DCCC = 800CM = 900X = 10XX = 20XXX = 30XL = 40L = 50LX = 60LXX = 70LXXX= 80XC = 90I = 1II = 2III = 3IV = 4V = 5VI = 6VII = 7VIII = 8IX = 9Using combinations of these numerals you can make any number from 1 up to 3999 (MMMCMXCIX). For example... DCLXVI (666) MCMLXXII (1972) MDLV (1555) and MDCCCLXXXVIII (1888).


Why is the Roman numeral four represented by IIII on a clock face instead of IV?

Roman Numerals Variations and WhyIt's said, that in Roman times, they didn't use IV for 4, because IV are the first two letters of the name of their king of the gods, Iupiter (IVPITER, as it was written). There are some clocks and sundials with 4 represented as IIII and some with IV.This isn't just a clocks thing. Both methods of writing Roman numerals have been in use since the 1500s, possibly longer. Clock makers choose whichever number they feel is more aesthetically appealing and they often go with IIII because it balances better with VIII on the other side and makes the clock look more symmetrical. By the same token they use IX and not VIIII for 9 because it matches the III on the other side better.Physicians traditionally use Roman numerals in lower case to specify the number of doses in a prescription. The lower case four(4) is usually written as iv, however, it can also be expressed as iiii - the explanation pharmacists often give, is they just count the dots on top - in other words, iiii instead of iv is for clarity. Perhaps more believable would be that it avoids confusion with the abbreviation "IV", which means intravenous, which could lead to a dangerous wrong drug administration route.Strict Roman NumeralsRoman Numerals never put more than three of any numeral together in a number (at least not in a strict sense). So you would count I, II, III, and then by placing a smaller numeral in front of a larger one, you would subtract; IV is 1 taken from 5, and so on. I 1II 1+1III 1+1+1IV -1+5V 5VI 5+1VII 5+1+1VIII 5+1+1+1IX -1+10X 10XI 10+1XII 10+1+1XIII 10+1+1+1XIV 10-1+5XV 10+5XVI 10+5+1XVII 10+5+1+1XVIII 10+5+1+1+1XIX 10-1+10XX 10+10...Using above rules:MCMLXIV 1000-100+1000+50+10-1+5 = 1964Here is the Roman way of writing 1964:MCMLXIV 1000+(1000-100)+(50+10)+(5-1) = 1964M CM LX IVAs you can see, Romans had to be very good at adding and subtracting!Not using above rules:MDCCCCLXIIII 1000+500+100+100+100+100+50+10+1+1+1+1 1964We can see how Roman Numerals get really long as the numbers get larger and by using four of a given numeral the numbers get even more long (which makes Roman Numerals less useful).