Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.
The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.
Since the question asks about rounding up rather than simply rounding, the answer is 3.97
-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
If rounding to the nearest ten: 795 If rounding to the nearest hundred: 750
Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.
The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.
Since the question asks about rounding up rather than simply rounding, the answer is 3.97
Well, isn't that a happy little question! When we round 115 up to the nearest hundred, we look at the tens place. Since 115 is closer to 200 than 100, it rounds up to 200. Just a little brush of kindness and math can make everything a little brighter!
Depends on what you are rounding to. Rounding to the nearest whole number, it is 10. Rounding to the nearest tens, it is still 10. Rounding to the nearest hundred, it is zero.
In whole numbers, rounding to the nearest ten is better. And in decimals, rounding to the nearest hundreth is more accurate.
Yes, if you are rounding to the nearest hundred. No, if you are rounding to the nearest ten.
That would depend on what you were rounding it to. If rounding to the nearest whole number, then it does not need rounding. If rounding to the nearest ten, it would be 420. If rounding to the nearest hundred, it would be 400.
-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
Yes, if you were rounding to the nearest ten. No, if you were rounding to the nearest hundred.